Category Archives: Digital Media

Digital Developments in Photography

I had corporate headshots taken a few weeks ago. (Check out Tess Steinkolk’s website  – she does an awesome job!). Before Tess began to shoot, we started discussing the impact of technology on photography. Everything is digital these days, and a photographer’s aptitude with Photoshop is just as important as the ability to compose the shot.  I told Tess about two new technologies which can change a lot for the casual photographer.

  • Lytro just came out with its own cameras which capture so much data that the photographer can focus the image (and different parts of the image) after the picture is taken. It uses a proprietary image format and is designed for digital media more than printing.
  • The other, Scalado, takes the form of an app.  It lets people take photos in busy areas and then remove people or other moving objects. It is a great way to get a picture of your family in fromt of an attraction and remove the other foot traffic.  Check out this video of Scalado.

What fascinates me is that both Lytro and Scalado make it easy for any below-average photographer (like me) do to some of the things it takes the professionals years to master (sorry Tess).

Blogging Again

I have decided to devote some more time to my blog again.

The first reason is that I may actually have something to writer about.  I have been completing an article about the development of social games, with a focus on Facebook.  In researching this article, I have uncovered a lot of interesting interesting information.  I hope to share some of it.

The second reason is that I have recently encouraged my father to start a blog.  He writes and publishes articles quite frequently, but doesn’t have a place to aggregate his identity on the web.   Since I will be creating this for him, I might as well get back in the habit myself.

Stay tuned.

Welcome to Google+

I just joined Google+ on Friday.  Here is a link to my profile: https://plus.google.com/115801910890938570573

I pasted the actual link rather than hiding it because I found it unusual.  All of my other social network profiles have cleaner links with my name in it.  I don’t know why Google chose to do it so differently.

I am still figuring out how Google+ works, but is seems less like Facebook and a little more like a combination of LinkedIn and Twitter.  There aren’t really mutual friendships, so much as the ability to follow and categorize people.  So you can follow people who don’t follow you and the other way around.  It is interesting how you can restrict who you share with.

Do you think people will move to Google+

Virtual Economics

I will be participating in a panel tomorrow on Managing Your Virtual Economy at the Engage! Conference and Expo in New York City.  This is my second time presenting on the topic.  Last September, I presented at the Practising Law Institute’s Technotainment 2010 Conference on Legal Issues with Virtual Worlds, Virtual Goods and Virtual Currencies.  There are a lot of legal an business issues that need to be addressed when setting up and managing a virtual economy.  I look forward to sharing my experiences on the panel.

For those of you that attended the Engage! panel, here is the link to the outline I promised: Virtual Economy Outline.  This is by no means a definitive outline.  It is just something I created when organizing my thoughts for the panel. Please feel free to comment on the outline and let me know if it is useful.

Business and Legal Topics – Virtual Currency Outline

This outline is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

Click here for a printable PDF version of this outline.

Table of Contents

 

I. Overview.. 1

A. Virtual Goods. 1

B. Virtual Currency. 2

C. Freemium.. 3

II. Examples. 3

A. Currencies. 3

B. Sample Service Providers. 4

III. Legal Issues. 5

A. Gambling, Lottery, Sweepstakes and Lottery Laws. 5

B. Gift Card, Stored Value Card and Escheat Laws. 6

C. Banking, Money Transfer Laws and Accounting Laws. 7

D. International Laws. 9

Continue reading

Repost from Continuations.com – A Different Threat to Net Neutrality

I recently exchanges comments with the author of continuations.com on the topic below.  If you have any additional thoughts, please comment on the original post.

A Different Threat to Net Neutrality

The whole fight about net neutrality is about to take a turn from the abstract to the concrete but in a somewhat unexpected way.  It is not ISPs or telcos that are turning out to be the immediate culprits, but rather content owners, specifically TV networks.  They are blocking Google TV from accessing their web sites with a regular browser and no changes to the experience.  So while you can connect your Google TV to the internet, these sites have chosen to block your access purely on the basis of the software that you are running.  While it is entirely legal for them to do so, it violates the most fundamental spirit of the web: the separation of client and server.  It is that separation of layers (server, transport, client) which has been the source of much of the innovation on the web!  I very much hope that this much more straightforward example of how violations of net neutrality are a risk for consumer choice and for innovation will finally make people wake up to how important an issue this is!  NB: It would technically straight forward for Google TV to “impersonate” a different browser at which point these blocks would fail and maybe that’s what they should do to really join this battle.

  • I think this point of view is misguided. Content owners have the right to control how their content is distributed. To ask them to be bound by “the fundamental spirit of the web” as you describe it, ignores the fact that they work based on business models that support their ability to invest in content. A wide embrace of your position will likely lead to less content being made freely available to anyone under any circumstances and possibly less quality content being created. @SethDMC
  • That’s not at all what I am saying. This is about content that they have chosen to make available for free to the public with ads. But now they are trying to restrict with what device/software people can access this free content. If Google were stripping ads from the content I would agree with you, but they are not.
  • The reality is that television content is distributed for different media with different economic models. Even if technology innovators consider this viewpoint antiquated, it remains the right of a content owner to restrict the device or software for access. GoogleTV is trying to disrupt the existing model to a degree — content owners need not simply acquiesce to this.
  • It seems like we are talking slightly past each other here and I am not sure how to express myself better. Let me give it another whirl.

    When you put something on the Internet, which is what broadcasters are doing on their web sites, then I believe it is in society’s best interest to let endusers connect with whatever browser they want to (with the caveat that I see no need for sites to support old browsers because endusers can freely upgrade to a modern browser of their choice).

    Why? If we did not allow for separate innovation on the client, we would still be browsing the web with Mosaic or early version of Netscape/IE. It is exactly the separation of innovation on the server, the transmission and the client that has made the web the carrier of the fastest innovation ever (by far faster than vertically integrated technologies, cf example the long labor over the switch to digital television).

    Note that this is different from saying that an aggregator should be able to come along and scrape your content, strip ads or anything else like it that would fundamentally alter the content that you are making available on the Internet. I am all in favor of things such as robots.txt which let you indicate that you don’t want to be spidered.

    So I am making a pretty narrow argument here about net neutrality, which is about the separations of the layers of the Internet (and not having one layer control the other), and you seem to be replying in very broad terms about the economics of content. If someone doesn’t want their content browsed, nobody is forcing them to put it on the web.

  • These are the types of discussions I have on a daily basis (which makes for interesting and challenging days on my part). I actually moderated a panel at the CMJ Conference yesterday, on the topic of mobile video. We focused in part on the differences between mobile and internet viewing (and where the iPad fits in) and how each works within the legacy television business model, the significance of which I think you are underestimating. Having worked at both disruptive and traditional media distribution companies, I could probably argue the other side too. I just think that technology companies need to work with content creators (instead of forcing their hand) to find ways that don’t destroy the business model that supports the actual creation of content. I work in NYC and would be happy to come downtown to meet for coffee and discuss with you further. Also, would it be OK to re-post our back and forth on my blog (www.SethDMC.com)?

My Facebook rules

Facebook Logo

All of my (offline/real) friends haves their own rules for accepting Facebook friends.  I have actually though about this a lot (and those of you who know me have probably heard me say the same thing over and over).  For those of you that don’t know me.  Here they are:

  • It must be someone I have actually met in person.
  • It must be someone I would actually recognize if I saw him or her.
  • It must be someone I want to share my personal information with.

This is the test I generally apply: If I had unlimited time, was walking on the sidewalk and saw the person on the other side of the street and that person didn’t see me, would I just keep going on my way or walk across the street and say hello.

If I keep walking, you should not be my Facebook friend!

What’s your test?

A LinkedIn Primer

I have been a member of LinkedIn since its inception in 2003.  (Special thanks to JoshK for inviting me as part of the beta.)  As I have amassed contacts and recommendations, newbies have asked me how to get started.  Recently, I advised one of our interns to get more involved on LinkedIn as part of a career search.  Here is my guide on building up your network.

Step 1: Make sure your profile is complete. Include all relevant jobs and education. Think of your profile as your online resume. Your LinkedIn profile is often the first thing that will come up when someone Googles you, so it is one of the few chances you have to control the information available about you on the web.

Step 2: Now it is time to grow your network. The easiest way is to find your colleagues and classmates that are already on LinkedIn.  As you start connecting with your past/current classmates and colleagues, don’t be surprised of other people start seeing you and asking you to connect.

  • Click “Contacts” on the left side navigation bar.
  • Click “Add Connections” on the top right of the page.
  • Click on the “Colleagues” and “Classmates” tabs to find people you already know.
  • Invite your desired connections to connect.

Step 3: Now that you have built out your profile and added your current/past colleagues and classmates, you should have a growing network. The next step is to see which members of your current contact lists are already on LinkedIn.

  • Click “Contacts” on the left side navigation bar.
  • Click “Add Connections” on the top right of the page.
  • Click “Check Webmail Contacts” on the right side – look for current connections.
  • If you use Outlook or another stand alone e-mail program, click on “Don’t Use Webmail” to learn how to export and upload your contacts.

Step 4: Now that you have hopefully added a number of classmates, colleagues, contacts and friends to your network, LinkedIn will start suggesting people you might know. Check out the “People you may know” box on the top right hand side of the page and see if LinkedIn found some people you missed!

**Remember – these are just ways to find connections. You shouldn’t necessarily connect with anyone you find, just like in the offline world. Only connect with people you feel comfortable with. The value of finding connections already on LinkedIn is that their networks become your networks, which creates instant value for you.

Location Based Services – Foursquare

FourSquare
As I previously posted, I have recently started using Foursquare.  For those of you who don’t know about Foursquare, it is a location based game and social network.  You link up with friends just like on Facebook and then use an app on your mobile device to check in at locations and places.  There are then points, awards, etc.  Like any social application, the greater number of friends you have, the greater the network.  I now have 22 friend, but only about half are in the same city as me (NY), which is important for a location based service.  Unlike Facebook, which has close to 500 million users, Foursquare has only 2 million.  While there are nascent local business uses for Foursquare, they haven’t really materialized yet because of the  low penetration.

In any case, I have been playing around and checking in.  (I actually got a warning for checking in too frequently this evening when I checked-in at every stop my train made on the ride home).  Like with any new application, I like to use and experience it so that I can effectively advise my clients when it becomes part of a marketing or other business use.

I decided that now was a great time to try it, since I will be traveling to the Casual Connect conference in Seattle next week.  I plan to check in at the various venues and events so that I can see how it works when there are many users around.  I will keep you updated.

Generational Platform Gaps: Location Based Services

We are spending the holiday weekend with my parents and my conversations with my father often expose the generation gaps in perceiving new platforms. At dinner this evening, I found myself explaining the concept of FourSquare and other location based services. I tried to explain how FourSquare was actually a platform and how it enabled people to connect with their existing social network. I even showed him how it worked on my Blackberry. My father was mystified about why people would do this.

Determined to explain, I gave examples including college students finding the bar where their friends are, me connecting with my colleagues at a conference. It still didn’t click.

Yet, I still receive an e-mail every time my parents get to a destination or return home that “We are [here]“. At least it’s an e-mail — progress happens slowly!

Let’s see what tomorrow will bring!